Have you guys looked at the PNET compiler from DotGNU?
Dennis
Jonathan Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
Having had a HUGE discussion with SharpOS last night I came up with a pretty
solid idea for merging our two codebases.
Firstly, I don't think it's a good idea to merge OCJ directly into SharpOS
right now: it will cause distractions (OCJ really needs to concentrate on
making a solid compiler a la Bartok, not a usable kernel). But we do need a
reference implementation of a kernel with which to test it: so I *think* right
now the best idea would be to make a new SVN repo and branch SharpOS. At this
point we can perform a rather large vasectomy on SharpOS and get it down to the
bare essentials, and after that concentrate on the runtime (SharpOS isn't
designed for OCJ, so we will have to appropriate it: e.g. ADC).
I think that will get us up to speed when OCJ is working. After that we can
approach SharpOS with the final (well, not so final as this is FOSS after all)
and perform the merge.
I looped in SharpOS to see if this is okay.
--
Jonathan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/_______________________________________________
SharpOS-Developers mailing list
SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
SharpOS-Developers mailing list
SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
