Yes, but the problem is that the AOT is missing some functionality, or has some bugs, which prevent us in properly implementing some parts of the kernel. In a way, we're kinda stuck and can't go forward because of it. So either we fix those bugs in the AOT, and implement those features that we need (which would be hard because the person(s) that know the most about the AOT are no longer active), or we wait until the new MOSA compiler is mature and developed enough to continue with the kernel.
Just to throw in another option: Don't the other teams, or at least the Cosmos, have compilers as well? Although they're not designed as well in the basis as the AOT, maybe we could 'borrow' one of these compilers for the time being until the MOSA compiler is finished? On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Zachary Gorden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Even if the intention is to replace the AOT, there shouldn't be any reason > to not continue development using it right now. The code should still > compile with a new compiler. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ SharpOS-Developers mailing list SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
