On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:45:02 AM MORITA Kazutaka wrote: > At Fri, 20 May 2011 22:25:27 -0400, > > David Nalley wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > Quick intro, I am, among other things, a packager for the Fedora Project > > and involved in the Fedora's Cloud SIG. I am also employed by Cloud.com > > and work on the CloudStack opensource IaaS project, where there's a good > > bit of interest in Sheepdog. > > > > Enough of that, I've started working on getting Sheepdog into Fedora. > > (and perhaps one day into EPEL if the qemu-kvm gets updated to a late > > enough release.) > > > > Feel free to watch the review: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706565 > > > > Alternately if you'd like to test my packages in Fedora 14 or later, > > please feel free to do so, I have put the current binary RPMs (along > > with SPEC and SRPM here) here: > > http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org > > > > Binary: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/sheepdog-0.2.2-2.fc14.x86_64.rpm > > > > Comments, thoughts, flames welcome, > > Thank you! After setting up corosync.conf and disabling iptables, I > could successfully install and start Sheepdog with your package. > > Is it possible to update the package to version 0.2.3, which contains > many important bug fixes? >
I'll try and get 0.2.3 up and ready in the next few hours. I also had to disable SELinux to get it to work on my Fedora instance. I'll ping some of the SELinux guys about writing a policy for sheepdog. --David
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
