MORITA Kazutaka <[email protected]> writes: > Thank you for your testing. I've implemented another approach. > Could you try again?
Hi Kazutaka. Yes, this one works fine, and survives the deletion of snapshots nicely. > The vdi id can change if we get the snapshot, so there is a problem > that vdi attributes vanish after taking snapshots. This patch uses > the hash value for the vdi attribute object id instead of the vdi id. Am I right in thinking that implementing in this way precludes the future implementation of vdi rename, or do existing assumptions in the design already make this impossible? Best wishes, Chris. -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
