On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 01:18:57AM +0900, MORITA Kazutaka wrote: > I think the performance could be a problem. The latency of a Sheepdog > is higher than other local disk formats because of data replication > and network latency, so Sheepdog would show a poorer performance with > something like databases.
If an app wants to update a single block, will this require Sheepdog to fetch an entire 4MB object, modify part of it, and write it back? You're right, I need to do some performance testing. Thanks, Brian. -- sheepdog mailing list sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
