At Mon, 31 Oct 2011 05:22:01 +0000, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > > if we use compiler-generator tools such as flex & bison, or python > > equivalent > > ones, not that hard to implement since we don't have to implement 'function > > call', aggregate data structure, etc. > > > > anyway, it is a bit to make a fuss over a trifling matter. but would be > > nice if > > anyone gives it a try. > > I think it is not worth to implement that. If you write the test framework in > python (or perl) you will have much more flexibility.
Yes, we can use loops, conditional branches, feature-rich libraries, and other softwares for Python programs. And I'd like to focus on adding more testcases rather than creating a new DSL for Sheepdog tests. Thanks, Kazutaka -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
