On 07/05/2012 07:57 PM, MORITA Kazutaka wrote: > Corosync delivers confchg events even if there remain the previous > events in corosync_event_list, doesn't it? Adding events to the head > of the queue breaks the guarantee that all the nodes must receive > confchg events in the same order, I think.
If corosync guarantee the delivery order of confchg, so we can reorder it at our will and the final order seen by sheep core will be the same I think, doesn't it? Thanks, Yuan -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
