On 07/05/2012 08:33 PM, Liu Yuan wrote: > On 07/05/2012 07:57 PM, MORITA Kazutaka wrote: >> Corosync delivers confchg events even if there remain the previous >> events in corosync_event_list, doesn't it? Adding events to the head >> of the queue breaks the guarantee that all the nodes must receive >> confchg events in the same order, I think. > > If corosync guarantee the delivery order of confchg, so we can reorder > it at our will and the final order seen by sheep core will be the same I > think, doesn't it? >
In the assumption that leave event is delivered and processed one by one. I think current implementation does it one by one for leave event. Thanks, Yuan -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
