At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:08:28 +0800,
levin li wrote:
>
> On 2012年07月11日 15:04, MORITA Kazutaka wrote:
> > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:42:45 +0800,
> > levin li wrote:
> >> @@ -435,11 +450,15 @@ static void delete_one(struct work *work)
> >> }
> >>
> >> ret = remove_object(oid);
> >> -
> >> if (ret != SD_RES_SUCCESS)
> >> eprintf("remove object %" PRIx64 " fail, %d\n", oid,
> >> ret);
> >> +
> >> + nr_deleted++;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + if (nr_deleted)
> >> + notify_vdi_deletion(vdi_id);
> >> +
> >
> > Should we notify it only when object cache is enabled?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Kazutaka
> >
>
> No, it's nothing to do with object cache, it's a reclaim work for object list
> cache.
Oops, sorry, I'll dig into it more tonight.
Thanks,
Kazutaka
--
sheepdog mailing list
sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org
http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
