> It just looks out of place in a directory of things that are otherwise short, > carefully chosen one-word names. If it's not meant to be user-visible, I'd > probably call it .sheepdog or something.
Oh, sure. I just avoided to make it invisible because I thought users considers that ugly ;-) > More generally, I'm not a fan of this behaviour change, but can always patch > it out again locally if there's otherwise consensus it's a good thing. So far there is no consensus ;-) But I can also always patch that in - it is just a few lines of code, easy to maintain. - Dietmar -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
