At Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:15:29 +0000,
Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> 
> > On 07/24/2012 03:48 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > > Why do you think so? It basically make things easier, and just remove
> > > lines of code.
> > 
> > It is just my estimation, I'd like to see real code.
> 
> I think we can reject requests until we really start recovering an object, 
> because
> the data is stored on the other nodes anyways.
> 
> I have to say that I still not fully understand all code, so please forgive 
> me if I post 
> nonsense ;-)
> 
> My na$(D+A(Bve patch looks like this (can be optimized further):

IIUC, your patch does not handle write requests because write
journaling is not implemented yet, yes?  I think it is not easy to
implement journaling across nodes.  Do you have any ideas to implement
it simply?

Thanks,

Kazutaka


> 
> From 0972d52d7a86cd2a265ae2a91592c36e853e7436 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Dietmar Maurer <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:17:47 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] only queue commands when necessary
> 
> We do not need to queue commands until we start recovering a specific object.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Maurer <[email protected]>
> ---
>  sheep/recovery.c   |   13 ++++++++++---
>  sheep/request.c    |    2 +-
>  sheep/sheep_priv.h |    2 +-
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sheep/recovery.c b/sheep/recovery.c
> index dd17edd..f2e2688 100644
> --- a/sheep/recovery.c
> +++ b/sheep/recovery.c
> @@ -242,11 +242,18 @@ int node_in_recovery(void)
>       return !!recovering_work;
>  }
>  
> -int is_recovery_init(void)
> +int is_recovery_init(uint64_t oid)
>  {
>       struct recovery_work *rw = recovering_work;
>  
> -     return rw->state == RW_INIT;
> +     if (rw->state == RW_INIT)
> +             return 1;
> +
> +     /* The oid is currently being recovered */
> +     if (rw->oids[rw->done] == oid)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     return 1;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void prepare_schedule_oid(uint64_t oid)
> @@ -312,7 +319,7 @@ bool oid_in_recovery(uint64_t oid)
>               return false;
>       }
>  
> -     prepare_schedule_oid(oid);
> +     //prepare_schedule_oid(oid);
>       return true;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/sheep/request.c b/sheep/request.c
> index 0fa5795..3865d4a 100644
> --- a/sheep/request.c
> +++ b/sheep/request.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static bool request_in_recovery(struct request *req)
>               /*
>                * Put request on wait queues of local node
>                */
> -             if (is_recovery_init()) {
> +             if (is_recovery_init(req->local_oid)) {
>                       req->rp.result = SD_RES_OBJ_RECOVERING;
>                       list_add_tail(&req->request_list,
>                                     &sys->wait_rw_queue);
> diff --git a/sheep/sheep_priv.h b/sheep/sheep_priv.h
> index e455d27..abebc69 100644
> --- a/sheep/sheep_priv.h
> +++ b/sheep/sheep_priv.h
> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ int start_recovery(struct vnode_info *cur_vnodes,
>       struct vnode_info *old_vnodes);
>  void resume_recovery_work(void);
>  bool oid_in_recovery(uint64_t oid);
> -int is_recovery_init(void);
> +int is_recovery_init(uint64_t oid);
>  int node_in_recovery(void);
>  
>  int write_object(uint64_t oid, char *data, unsigned int datalen,
> -- 
> 1.7.2.5
> 
> 
> 
-- 
sheepdog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog

Reply via email to