At Wed, 8 Aug 2012 14:41:58 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 03:39:25AM +0900, MORITA Kazutaka wrote: > > How about creating another branch for 0.4.1 and avoiding including any > > patches that change the internal protocol? > > Either that or deciding that we're not quite ready for a stable protocol > yet. Given that amount of churn that's going on I suspect the latter > might be better for now. > > That'll also allow things like breaking the COW link on gateway patches > from about a month ago to go on more easily.
Okay, the latter sounds reasonable to me for now. I wonder we should define the protocol so that we don't need to change it for each time we add new features, though. Thanks, Kazutaka -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
