At Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:17:35 +0800, Liu Yuan wrote: > > On 08/26/2012 07:15 PM, Liu Yuan wrote: > > The problem your patch set don't handle is: for default_read(), when > > iocb.epoch < sys_epoch() > > we need read upwards like Farm did to fix subtle problems found in multiple > > node change events. > > Oops, your patch did handle this case.
My patch doing it downwards (from the latest epoch to the older epoch). I couldn't understand why farm did it upwards because the later epoch should have newer objects. I've tested your updated test 028, and seems that the current devel branch can pass it. Thanks, Kazutaka -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
