At Fri, 31 Aug 2012 04:50:41 +0000, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > > > Why rollback create another vdi? I thought of rollback in place > > > instead of creating another VDI object too. > > > > If we don't delete newer snapshots than the rollbacked one (this behavior is > > same as VMware and VirtualBox), adding a child vdi to the snapshot looks > > the easiest way to implement the operation. > > Yes, but you can still delete the actual vdi, because that is no longer > needed?
Yes, it is unnecessary. If we add a new child vdi to the rollback snapshot, the previous state becomes a new snapshot automatically. Perhaps collie should delete it after we safely rollback to the snapshot. Thanks, Kazutaka -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
