At Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:05:54 +0800, Liu Yuan wrote: > > On 04/10/2013 03:51 PM, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: > > I don't disagree with making journaling as a default feature. But it > > seems that current journaling needs to be improved and debugged. I > > believe removing -j option should be done after enough stabilizing. > > This process looks sens to me. I agree journaling need much debugging > and improvement. So what do you think of 'improvement' to bring to > journaling before we can apply it as default?
I believe -j option can be removed after passing all tests with -j option itself. Currently some tests fail with journaling. This wouldn't take a long time, -j is a temporal thing. Thanks, Hitoshi -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
