At Thu, 02 May 2013 10:17:32 +0800, Liu Yuan wrote: > > On 05/02/2013 12:50 AM, MORITA Kazutaka wrote: > > When timeout happens, we cannot reuse the socket for other transfers > > because data may remain in its send (or recv) buffer. We have to > > close the socket before making the sockfd_cache reusable. > > I am wondering if we should add a dedicated handler for closing > timeout-fd only, not destroy all the fds.
I'm not sure if I understand your suggestion correctly, but from the point of view that we have to set false to .in_use and close the timeout fd in the same lock context, adding another handler doesn't look a good idea to me. Thanks, Kazutaka -- sheepdog mailing list sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
