At Thu, 26 Sep 2013 21:40:19 -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > > On 09/26/2013 08:40 PM, Dan Mick wrote: > > > >> Thanks for the explanation. > >> So if there is no sheepdog library at this stage then I guess there is > >> no alternative to having a full reimplementation. > >> In that case it should not matter much whether it is built in or a > >> module. > > > > +1 > > Yeah I'm also fine with built-in for now. Nice to see these new > backstores being added!
Thanks for your understanding and comments! Could you apply the patch to the master branch, Fujita-san? Or should I improve for fixing known problems before applying? Thanks, Hitoshi -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
