On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:45:23AM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: > Current object repair strategy of "dog vdi check" doesn't work well if > objects are corrupted. The first one adds a test for the case, and the > second patch adds a mechanism for majority voting in the command. > > v5: drop ignore change in v4
Applied after fixing new blank line at EOF for 077 I'd like to see patche(s) that deal with the case when majority object isn't found. What in my head to deal with this is: - add an option 'depth' for 'dog vdi track' command to get the information of targeted object placement. With this information, people can do a manual copy\overwrite to missing/inconsistent objects. Thanks Yuan -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
