Previous protection scheme of wi->nr_thread in work.c was
unclear because wi->startup_lock was also used for protecting it
during workqueue grow/shrink. This patch let work.c protect
wi->nr_thread by the new wi->workers_lock.

Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <[email protected]>
---
 lib/work.c |   16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/work.c b/lib/work.c
index 50b57a5..9d5c5a9 100644
--- a/lib/work.c
+++ b/lib/work.c
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ struct worker_info {
        pthread_mutex_t pending_lock;
        /* protected by pending_lock */
        struct work_queue q;
+
+       pthread_mutex_t workers_lock;
+       /* protected by workers_lock */
        size_t nr_threads;
 
        /* protected by uatomic primitives */
@@ -247,18 +250,18 @@ static int create_worker_threads(struct worker_info *wi, 
size_t nr_threads)
        pthread_t thread;
        int ret;
 
-       pthread_mutex_lock(&wi->startup_lock);
+       pthread_mutex_lock(&wi->workers_lock);
        while (wi->nr_threads < nr_threads) {
                ret = pthread_create(&thread, NULL, worker_routine, wi);
                if (ret != 0) {
                        sd_err("failed to create worker thread: %m");
-                       pthread_mutex_unlock(&wi->startup_lock);
+                       pthread_mutex_unlock(&wi->workers_lock);
                        return -1;
                }
                wi->nr_threads++;
                sd_debug("create thread %s %zu", wi->name, wi->nr_threads);
        }
-       pthread_mutex_unlock(&wi->startup_lock);
+       pthread_mutex_unlock(&wi->workers_lock);
 
        return 0;
 }
@@ -323,10 +326,13 @@ static void *worker_routine(void *arg)
 
                pthread_mutex_lock(&wi->pending_lock);
                if (wq_need_shrink(wi)) {
+                       pthread_mutex_unlock(&wi->pending_lock);
+
+                       pthread_mutex_lock(&wi->workers_lock);
                        wi->nr_threads--;
+                       pthread_mutex_unlock(&wi->workers_lock);
 
                        trace_clear_tid_map(tid);
-                       pthread_mutex_unlock(&wi->pending_lock);
                        pthread_detach(pthread_self());
                        sd_debug("destroy thread %s %d, %zu", wi->name, tid,
                                 wi->nr_threads);
@@ -415,6 +421,7 @@ struct work_queue *create_work_queue(const char *name,
        pthread_mutex_init(&wi->finished_lock, NULL);
        pthread_mutex_init(&wi->pending_lock, NULL);
        pthread_mutex_init(&wi->startup_lock, NULL);
+       pthread_mutex_init(&wi->workers_lock, NULL);
 
        ret = create_worker_threads(wi, 1);
        if (ret < 0)
@@ -424,6 +431,7 @@ struct work_queue *create_work_queue(const char *name,
 
        return &wi->q;
 destroy_threads:
+       pthread_mutex_unlock(&wi->workers_lock);
        pthread_mutex_unlock(&wi->startup_lock);
        pthread_cond_destroy(&wi->pending_cond);
        pthread_mutex_destroy(&wi->pending_lock);
-- 
1.7.10.4

-- 
sheepdog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog

Reply via email to