At Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:58:08 +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: > > At Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:51:48 +0900, > Hitoshi Mitake wrote: > > > > At Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:42:35 +0800, > > Liu Yuan wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 08:49:34PM +0800, Liu Yuan wrote: > > > > From: Liu Yuan <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > This patch fixes following problem: > > > > > > > > $ dog vdi create test 100M > > > > $ dog vdi delete test > > > > $ dog vdi create test 200M > > > > $ dog vdi list # expect show test, but nothing shows out. > > > > > > > > Which was brought by > > > > > > > > *commit f68feab7edc0ded86701a2e902d85616b24942ab > > > > *Author: Saeki Masaki <[email protected]> > > > > *Date: Wed Nov 26 10:50:46 2014 +0900 > > > > > > > > sheep/dog: introduce new bitmap for delete vdi > > > > > > > > Cc: Saeki Masaki <[email protected]> > > > > Signed-off-by: Liu Yuan <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > sheep/ops.c | 7 +++++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/sheep/ops.c b/sheep/ops.c > > > > index 8a0f77c..464ae0b 100644 > > > > --- a/sheep/ops.c > > > > +++ b/sheep/ops.c > > > > @@ -130,11 +130,14 @@ static int post_cluster_new_vdi(const struct > > > > sd_req *req, struct sd_rsp *rsp, > > > > unsigned long nr = rsp->vdi.vdi_id; > > > > int ret = rsp->result; > > > > > > > > - sd_info("req->vdi.base_vdi_id: %x, rsp->vdi.vdi_id: %x", > > > > req->vdi.base_vdi_id, rsp->vdi.vdi_id); > > > > + sd_info("req->vdi.base_vdi_id: %x, rsp->vdi.vdi_id: %x", > > > > + req->vdi.base_vdi_id, rsp->vdi.vdi_id); > > > > > > > > sd_debug("done %d %lx", ret, nr); > > > > - if (ret == SD_RES_SUCCESS) > > > > + if (ret == SD_RES_SUCCESS) { > > > > atomic_set_bit(nr, sys->vdi_inuse); > > > > + atomic_clear_bit(nr, sys->vdi_deleted); > > > > + } > > > > > > > > return ret; > > > > } > > > > -- > > > > 1.9.1 > > > > > > > > > > At least this patch fixes a real problem and should be applied, Hitoshi? > > > > > > Yuan > > > > Applied this one, thanks. > > On the second thought, this problem cannot happen on the current > master. It is caused by the old invalid recycling. So I'll revert > it, OK? > # seems that there's no patches after this one, I'll simply rebase and > # update forcibly
Removed this one, sorry for confusion. Thanks, Hitoshi -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
