On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:31:47PM +0300, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: > Per volume redundancy useful for hostings or openstack based solutions. So > users may need to pay for stability or increase speed.. > 14 мая 2015 г. 13:21 пользователь "Valerio Pachera" <[email protected]> > написал: > > > IMHO, per volume redundancy, is something I never felt the need for.
Per volume redundancy might be useful for a huge cluster with 10000+ nodes, which serve a larger quantity of people with different requirements. But for now, serveral small sized clusters ( < 100) would be recommended to build a large data center, each equiped with different settings for different use. Thanks, Yuan -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
