2015-06-07 21:11 GMT+03:00 Fabian Zimmermann <[email protected]>: > I would use vdi locking if there is no other way to avoid concurrent > access to a single vdi. > > f.e. if you use sheepdog as storage and there is a (even very small) > possibility that a VM is started twice (split-brain in cluster?) > > As far as I understand the current implementation it's not possible to > use native libvirt live-migration with vdi-locking enabled, but you > could of course use suspend-migrate-wake migrations.
=( I'm realy need live migration and vdi locking is the benefit (because now i have sometimes exceptions when control server can't connect to compute nodes and think that it die, try to run vps on another node and i have split-brain =() -- Vasiliy Tolstov, e-mail: [email protected] -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
