At Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:57:53 +0530, ankit bhardwaj wrote: > > [1 <multipart/alternative (7bit)>] > [1.1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>] > I am using 3 node cluster , with 3 copies of disk image. So, each node have > a full copy of disk image.
Could you provide an option for your sheep processes? Thanks, Hitoshi > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Vasiliy Tolstov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > 2015-06-23 1:40 GMT+03:00 ankit bhardwaj <[email protected]>: > > > I am new to Sheepdog. Though I have gained enough knowledge to deploy and > > > use sheepdog for qemu-kvm VMs. I tried to benchmark Sheepdog and found > > that: > > > > > > 1. Sheepdog's Maximum Read/Write Speed is around 70-80% compared to local > > > storage. That too when the condition are in favour of sheepdog. Example: > > > Full copy of data on same node and Reading or writing sequential Data > > etc. > > > > > > 2. When using VM disk image to boot VM from Sheepdog storage, some extra > > > system activities increase the load on the CPU from 30-40%. > > > > > > Can you please tell me,: > > > Why the speed is slow, even if all the data is on the same machine ? > > > What activity in sheepdog is eating up my processor cycles ? > > > > > > > > > Sorry for the loosely described experiments and results. > > > > > > I think we need command line for running sheepdog and how you format > > you cluster (erasure coded or replicas) ? > > > > -- > > Vasiliy Tolstov, > > e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > -- > Ankit Bhardwaj > [1.2 <text/html; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>] > > [2 <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>] > -- > sheepdog mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
