2015-07-02 17:34 GMT+03:00 Hitoshi Mitake <[email protected]>: > Applied, thanks. BTW, is it possible to write a patch which makes > build with corosync 1.x fail, Vasiliy? > > As far as we know, Corosync 1.x has as serious bug in its message > drivery mechanism. In addition, current corosync driver heavily > depends on 2.x specific API semantics. Therefore, I want to let > build with corosync 1.x fail unconditionally. If you can write a > patch, it is very helpful for us :)
I'm send new version with possible support for corosync 1.x But i don't have corosync 1.x =) so can't check compilation. -- Vasiliy Tolstov, e-mail: [email protected] -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
