2015-08-11 9:19 GMT+03:00 Yu Yang <[email protected]>:
> Hi, Hitoshi,
> I am sorry to say that those patches may not be merged directly.  It may not 
> work correctly.
>
> I check the patch here(c4e320b965fa47f74bbf0461e8c0043afef3d807) which is 
> different from the original patch I submit in sheepdog-ng,
> I don't know why but I'm sure it cannot work as expect and import bugs. 
> However , this is just one example and I didn't check others.
>
> And also as there is a bit different between sheepdog and sheepdog-ng, if 
> those patches token from sheepdog-ng would be merged into sheepdog,  some 
> work need to be done and the code need be reviewed.
>


Sorry, but i don't understand how this
c250eee4e86df992f33ec625dfaa7dbf48c9d5b1 goes to sheepdog as
c4e320b965fa47f74bbf0461e8c0043afef3d807 can bring bugs. May be i miss
something, but sd_run_sdreq returns already req->ret, so returned
values means request status.

-- 
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail: [email protected]
-- 
sheepdog mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog

Reply via email to