On 22.09.20 08:56, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 22/09/20 08:45, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> It's certainly a good idea but it's quite verbose. >>> >>> What about using atomic__* as the prefix? It is not very common in QEMU >>> but there are some cases (and I cannot think of anything better). >> >> aqomic_*, lol :) > > Actually qatomic_ would be a good one, wouldn't it?
agreed! -- Thanks, David / dhildenb -- sheepdog mailing list sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org https://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
