On 6/7/07, Peter Memishian <peter.memishian at sun.com> wrote: > > > Looks like it was part of UNIX2003/SUSv3 compliance in Solaris 10: > > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4763915 > > > > In which case, -p would still be needed for any scripts that could ever be > run > > on pre-S10 releases. > > Indeed. So coming back around to Roland's write-up: I think it should > recommend -p.
Why recommend a switch which is no longer needed in Solaris >= 10 for /bin/ksh and /bin/ksh93? Irek
