Note that I have removed PSARC-ext from the distribution list and removed the case number from the subject line. I don't believe PSARC is interested in this side discussion.
On Mar 12, 2010, 22:01:50 +0100, olga.kryzhanovska at gmail.com wrote: > Don, we do not intend to make all closed utilities we replace builtins > in ksh93. Making AST sed a builtin was just an easy thing because the > code is well designed and easy to make re-entrant. > > Olga Hi Olga, I realize that. I was just trying to reassure Alan and Garrett that the project team that has been replacing "closed", "standard" utilities with AST code (whether stand-alone or built into ksh93 has always made sure that the code passes the VSC tests by fixing the code or by getting TOG to fix the test suite (with Sun's help) before integrating into the ON source base.
