First, sorry about the delay. On 14/02/16 08:51, Michal Welnicki wrote: >> This should be fixed now. Thanks for the report! > > Unfortunately it still doesn't work: Oops: I had fired the email without actually testing the installation in a VM. (just being lazy)
> Error: Package: xpra-0.16.2-2.el6_7.i686 (winswitch) > Requires: libvpx.so.2 > Removing: libvpx-xpra-1.4.0-1.el6.i686 (@winswitch) > libvpx.so.2 > Updated By: libvpx-xpra-1.5.0-1.el6.i686 (winswitch) > Not found > > "yum clean metadata" does not help. > > The new xpra version is still built for libvpx.so.2 (libvpx 1.4.0): > > $ rpm -qp --requires > http://xpra.org/dists/CentOS/6.7/i386/xpra-0.16.2-2.el6_7.i686.rpm | > grep vpx > libvpx-xpra > libvpx.so.2 > > And libvpx-xpra-1.5.0-1.el6.i686.rpm only provides libvpx.so.3: > > $ rpm -qp --provides > http://xpra.org/dists/CentOS/6.7/i386/libvpx-xpra-1.5.0-1.el6.i686.rpm > libvpx.so.3 > libvpx-xpra = 1.5.0-1.el6 > libvpx-xpra(x86-32) = 1.5.0-1.el6 > > Perhaps the 32-bit build host doesn't have libvpx-devel updated to 1.5.0? It did have it, at least the RPM db thought it did - which confused me for a while, but it was actually linking against the system libvpx.so Not sure what happened there, but a clean rebuild seems to have resolved that, I think. The yum error message is a little bit confusing. This is not the first time I have wished that yum/dnf/rpm would be more clever about managing dependencies so one could more easily link against different versions all living in the same repository. Maybe I missing a trick there? Cheers Antoine > > Regards, > Michal > > _______________________________________________ > shifter-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.devloop.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/shifter-users _______________________________________________ shifter-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.devloop.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/shifter-users
