Hi Matteo,

I agree with your explanation in that the direction of the gravity vector as
measured by the accelerometer is infact upwards. It is important to be aware
that under quasi-static conditions the assumed direction does not effect the
calculation of inclination as long as the user is consistent in their
calculations. In the next release of the 9DOF Calibration application we
will reverse the direction of the reference vector. Thankyou for your
assistance on this topic.

Best Regards,

Karol

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matteo
Giuberti
Sent: 07 September 2012 16:47
To: Karol O'Donovan; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Shimmer-users] SHIMMER calibration

 

Dear Karol,

thank you for the quick reply.

 

Actually, I think the idea behind an accelerometer is much more involved.

Just to go step-by-step, I want you to reason upon this: when an
accelerometer is in free-fall (imagine you let it fall from your hand to the
ground) what will it measure? 

Maybe I'm wrong, but I always thinked that it will measure 0g. If this is
right, then it is not actually measuring the gravity force but the
accelerations that act on the device apart from the gravity force. 

Indeed, my previous idea (that of the + and - signs in the previous mail)
was based on the fact that if a device was leaned still on a table it should
measure an acceleration that counteracts that of the gravity force (even if
physicians will tell me that it is actually a force and not an acceleration)
in order to let the device still!

So, I think that a SHIMMER whose z-axis is pointing vertically up should
measure a +1g (or +9.8m/sec^2) AND NOT -1g (that is obtained instead through
your calibration).

 

If there is something wrong in my reasoning please try to let me understand!

 

P.S. Just to provide you more evidence I just found on wikipedia this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerometer

If you read in the introduction and in the "physical principles" sections
you will find more or less the explanation I just provided to you.

I know Wikipedia is not exactly a trustworthy source, but it actually said
what I knew about that topic!

 

Regards,

Matteo

 

2012/9/7 Karol O'Donovan <[email protected]>

Dear Matteo,

The gravity vector is a vector of magnitude 9.8 m/s^2 which points downwards
(i.e. towards the centre of the earth). Using the convention suggested in
the manual, when you have the Shimmer orientated such that the sticker/leds
are pointing upwards then +z-axis is also pointing upwards. The gravity
vector is thus pointing in the opposite direction to the +z-axis and
therefore registers a negative value. 

 

Hopefully this helps to resolve the problems you are having.

 

Best Regards,

Karol

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matteo Giuberti
Sent: 07 September 2012 11:35
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Shimmer-users] SHIMMER calibration

 

Dear all,

 

I have some SHIMMERs with the 9DoF module and I have to calibrate the
sensors (accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer) in order to use their
output in an orientation estimation filter.

I'm using the calibration software provided to the member user and, reading
the manual, I've noticed that the instructions provided to calibrate the
accelerometer lead to a calibration of the accelerometer that is different
from all the previous devices that I've experienced in the past.

Let me first say that I've used the same coordinate axis convention that you
suggested in the manual.

Following that convention, I was expected to see, for example when the
Shimmer main side (i.e., the one with the sticker and the leds) is pointing
toward the ceiling, a z-acceleration almost equal to +9.81 m/sec^2. Instead
it is -9.81 m/sec^2.

 

Can you motivate me this choice (that, I repeat, is different from the
conventions that I previously experienced in other devices)? Do you think it
will be a problem to calibrate ONLY accelerometer using my convention?

 

I hope I clarified my point.

Otherwise, I'll try to explain it better.

 

Best regards,

Matteo

 

_______________________________________________
Shimmer-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.eecs.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/shimmer-users

Reply via email to