Hi Kevin, Thanks for the response. To be fair, the string that references a hostname is only the initial value in the form field - no real consequences, I'm more interested in what it implies. So, for (at least my) reference purposes, does anyone know of a quick and simple way to serve the stuff in javascript/ at localhost:8080/gadgets/, peer to ifr? I ask because it seems like life will be easier that way and because I would say someone is doing it. (But perhaps I'm quite mistaken.)
Thanks and regards, Adam On 23/01/2008, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The stuff in javascript/ is there for reference purposes, so we assume > some > editing. > > That being said, most of these paths should probably be changed to be > relative to the /ifr servlet rather than making any explicit assumptions > about host names and whatnot. At a minimum, we want to avoid hard coding > any > host names. > > localhost:8080 is where the server runs by default when using the jetty > target. This will of course be different if you're not using jetty, and > you > should use whatever is appropriate for your server environment. > > ~Kevin > > On Jan 23, 2008 11:11 AM, Adam Mathias Bittlingmayer < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > <Pardon me if this question or its answer has already been seen here.> > > > > The docs and several hardcoded partial urls sort of assume that one is > > serving the contents of javascript/ at http://yourhost:yourport/gadgets > > > > For example: > > > > javascript/README: > > C) Hit the sample container at > > > http://yourserver:yourport/gadgets/samplecontainer/samplecontainer.html > > > > javascript/samplecontainer/samplecontainer.html: > > var specUrl = ' > > > > > http://localhost:8080/gadgets/samplecontainer/examples/SocialHelloWorld.xml > > '; > > > > javascript/samplecontainer/examples/SocialHelloWorld.xml > > background-image: url(/gadgets/samplecontainer/examples/bubble.gif); > > > > This also implies that it should be served from the same port as the > java/ > > (the rendering servlet). Since someone is obviously doing it this way, > > there's no sense making my life hard by changing everything to work with > a > > > > different setup especially as changes continue to flow in, so I would > like > > to emulate that setup, but it's not immediately obvious to me how (or if > > there is some very simple way to do this). > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > Adam > > >
