[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-51?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kevin Brown updated SHINDIG-51:
-------------------------------

    Attachment: servlet-changes.patch

Removed eclipse auto comment from last version.

> Overhaul servlet initialization.
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SHINDIG-51
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-51
>             Project: Shindig
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Kevin Brown
>            Assignee: Kevin Brown
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: servlet-changes.patch
>
>
> While doing work to implement the RpcServlet that has been discussed before 
> (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-25), it became quite 
> apparent that we can't do a whole lot more without fixing the gaping hole of 
> servlet configuration (essentially, there's no way to use your own 
> implementations of most of the core classes or inject your own javascript 
> without either modifying GadgetRenderingServlet itself, or by using a servlet 
> engine that allows for programmatic servlet creation).
> I've attached a patch with a proposed solution (it also contains some minor 
> performance tweaks and bug fixes that I was working on at the time, but 
> nothing major). I don't really know if there's a cleaner way to do this or 
> not since I'm not that familiar with the Servlet spec, but it seems to fit 
> well within the model and will finally give us a place to inject 
> implementation specific components without resorting to ugly hacks and 
> workarounds.
> This patch will break any existing hacky workaround type solutions, because 
> it eliminates all of the constructors from all of the servlets, and instead 
> configures the servlets the "proper" way by passing shared data through the 
> ServletContext. This means that if I apply this patch, anyone who has done 
> this sort of thing will need to change some code to make it work again. With 
> that in mind, I'd prefer to send it here and let everyone review it before 
> committing. This also removes some previously deprecated methods from 
> GadgetServer which simply won't be needed in this model.
> All feedback is appreciated.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to