I think the single page proposal was fine to bootstrap, but I think we should split it out into separate pages to play nice with the rest of the web. This is plain html after all :)
I imagine the refactoring would take less than 20 minutes. -Dan On Feb 6, 2008 2:10 AM, Bruno Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd tend to agree. If we wanted to preload the data, could you just put > the other pages inside an iframe? > > > On Feb 6, 2008 1:59 AM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 5, 2008 4:08 PM, Bruno Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Fair point about search engine traffic Brian. The search engine > > crawler > > > will > > > still find the content but it would only land you on the "home" tab. > > At > > > that > > > point the other tabs would still only be a click away. The benefit of > > this > > > page is instant switching between the content. > > > > > > This is only really useful while the content is small. Once we have a > > large > > number of "pages" this will become impossible to maintain and slow to > > load. > > Static files aren't ever going to take much time to load anyway, even on > > slow connections. > > > >
