I thought I fixed the opensocial-0.7/batchrequest one to use the passed in path value that comes from the feature.xml but I guess I mixed that up. I will fix that shortly.
I don't want you to worry too much though Chris because 99% of the Shindig users can't rely on localhost:8080.. not google's hosted Shindig, not Orkut, not hi5... so it isn't just the php :) The only place you will ever see this bug is actually in the sample or new stuff just because no one is actually using it outside of development. This is why you saw me use it in the opensocial-0.7 stuff which is all a wip. I was trying to get rid of it, but makeRequest needs a full url. I simply need to move the opensocial-0.7 path into the config file.. and have it use the parent or something. Anyway, I will fix this for you soon and I promise I won't do it again. - Cassie On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ps my mistake on the compliance test, it turns out that the javascript > in opensocial-0.7 makes it do a request to localhost:8080 and not its > own code > > On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 16:51 +0100, Chris Chabot wrote: > > > Hey Guys, > > > > Now i understand the PHP version might not be a priority for a lot of > > you, but every time i run into some localhost:8080 requests, i become a > > little sad at the time it'll cost me to hack the code locally again to > > make it work with the PHP port. I'm actively developing it and trying to > > follow the SVN trunk, but i can't do that if the examples, features, > > javascripts and container code don't work on both versions. > > > > Today i noticed in the svn sync that i now got 2 hardcoded > > localhost:8080 values in features/opensocial-0.7 (feature.xml and > > batchrequest.js, the one in feature.xml being new) > > > > Also the compliance test that i use a lot > > ( > http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/tests/trunk/compliancetests.xml) > also features a hard coded reference to localhost:8080 (which ps throws the > results in the various opensocial sandboxes that i also run this gadget on > out of curiosity a bit off too). > > > > Anyhow, can't we find a way to get along without committing things that > > make each others lives harder? I think if i would commit things that > > would make the java version not work out of the box you'd feel the same > > right? :) > > > > -- Chris > > >
