I agree, we definitely need to look at this more closely. I've attached a new patch to SHINDIG-92 that removes the encryption functions from the code. Can someone please apply that patch so we can go back and do this the right way?
My understanding is that the authentication functions in the code are less likely to cause export problems. I've left those in. If someone believes otherwise, I can help remove them as well. Cheers, Brian On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think this commit is the point where we might hit > http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html > > I'm not sure as I am feeling quite sick right now, and not like trying > to understand either the crypto faq or the whole scope of the code, but > someone should start taking a look into it. > > Regards > Santiago > > > El mar, 11-03-2008 a las 03:44 -0700, Paul Lindner (JIRA) escribió: > > > > [ > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > > ] > > > > Paul Lindner resolved SHINDIG-92. > > --------------------------------- > > > > Resolution: Fixed > > > > Patch committed > > > > > > > Crypto utility functions for gadget server > > > ------------------------------------------ > > > > > > Key: SHINDIG-92 > > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-92 > > > Project: Shindig > > > Issue Type: Improvement > > > Components: Gadgets Server - Java > > > Reporter: Brian Eaton > > > Assignee: Kevin Brown > > > Attachments: crypto.patch > > > > > > > > > Shindig will eventually need some crypto utility functions. I've put > some together based on JCE and the Apache Codec libraries. > > > -- > Santiago Gala > http://memojo.com/~sgala/blog/ > >
