There are currently two versions of the request content-type floating
around the Shindig java code, one in the
RemoteContentRequest.contentType variable and another in the
RemoteContentRequest.headers variable.  Values can make their way into
the content type through several mechanisms, including javascript
running on the client and hardcoded values in the Shindig code.

I'm sure there is some corollary to Murphy's Law that says that if you
have two versions of a piece of data floating around, one will be
wrong.  I'd like to fix RemoteContentRequest so that there is a single
location that someone can check to see what content-type header was
specified by gadgets.io.makeRequest.  Does anyone feel strongly about
where that single location should be, or should I just pick one?

Cheers,
Brian

Reply via email to