On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to be taking the shindig jar from repo2.apache.org/maven2 > and adding it to my own webapp, pulling the transitive deps through > maven. > > Then adding my own jar, with some Guice modules to reconfigure the > services and a custom web.xml to add those modules in. > > Ideally I dont want to have to open up the shindig jar and change > anything inside it. > > This will fit in with our build and deployment, which at most of the > sites in production is automated. > > but.... thats just one view of one user of Shindig, certainly not the > only opinion. > > From what I have read and seen so far, I think that that approach fits in > ? Yes, as I said, this is essentially what we're doing at Google. I expect that it'll be the preferred approach for most people running Java already, whereas the war approach might be more suitable for containers that just want to do some minor configuration changes. > > Ian > > On 04/04/2008, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > What is the planned deployment story for java-shindig? Do we want > people > > > to > > > be able to take the war, drop it in a servlet container sprinkled > with > > > config magic to wire up their interfaces, and be done? Alternately, > do > > > they > > > need to open up the war and rejigger it around? > > > > > > > > Right now we're producing both a war and a jar. At google we're using > the > > jar and wiring up some customized RemoteContentFetchers and a > > GadgetTokenDecoder. Other people might want the war. > > > > The war is probably the best option for the black box solution. There > are > > definitely still some rough edges here, though, like providing a > startup > > script. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Brian > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I think the patch I send a few hours back was missing some things, > here > > > it > > > > is again (and working). Sorry if that wasted your time..... please > > > ignore if > > > > you have already done it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4 Apr 2008, at 11:16, Cassie wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ian - your patch didn't come through. > > > > > > > > > > I am working on this as we speak and hope to have something > checked in > > > > > in just a couple hours (before my flight to london). If your > patch > > > > > works Ian - I'll gladly use it! > > > > > > > > > > - Cassie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > ~Kevin > > > -- ~Kevin
