El mar, 06-05-2008 a las 01:46 -0500, Brian W. Fitzpatrick escribió:
> Please see the issue attachment for the actual file in question.
>
> Note that this does not include the following committers from Google,
> who I propose we remove from the project as they've not participated
> (they have consented to be removed):
>
> bstoler Brian Stoler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> dcoker Doug Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> dglazer David Glazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> dharkness David Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David Harkness has actually committed:
commit b7c5b19443007a17c50fcc6b75ba7a0ff2d413d5
Author: David Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri Jan 11 00:40:02 2008 +0000
Added repository (code.google.com) and dependency for Caja.
git-svn-id:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---
java/gadgets/pom.xml | 15 ++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
So I think he should be kept in the file, even if he is "emeritus" or
something. Not sure about typical procedures for it.
> gfs Graham Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> jpanzer John Panzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ramani Ramkumar Ramani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> termie Andy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I'm not proposing any action for the following people, but they were
> proposed committers from the official incubation proposal*, so we
> should either get their CLAs and get them access or discuss removing
> them as well, IMO:
>
> Jeffrey Regan (Google)
> Jussi Myllymaki (Google)
> Dan Farino (MySpace)
> David Sklar (Ning)
> Thomas Baker (Ning)
> Tim Williamson (Ning)
>
> * http://markmail.org/message/6hed4akb4jefcdur
>
Also, their names are in <developer> tags in pom.xml files, so it would
actually make sense to have the COMMITTERS generated from it or the
other way around. If it is not judged worth the pain I can take care of
both things and sync the current poms with the final COMMITTERS file.
> -Fitz
--
Santiago Gala
http://memojo.com/~sgala/blog/
