On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Paul Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi, long time no commit.
>
> So I¹m starting the hi5 rebase to trunk now.  I¹m also interested in
> getting
> as many 0.8 features incorporated as possible.  Basically I want to commit
> 0.8 code to shindig repo instead of committing hackish workaround to my
> local repo.
>
> We should go through the 0.8 changes one by one and open JIRA issues for
> any
> feature that is not implemented.  Perhaps prefix them with 0.8 so they can
> be easily filtered.  (Alternatively we can create the ³0.8² version of
> shindig and just mark all 0.8 bugs fixed in version ³0.8²)


I brought this up in an email last week -- I think all 0.8 changes can be
implemented while retaining backwards compatibility. If we see anything that
can't, we can figure out a way to work around it.

The way I see it, these are the major categories of 0.8 items:

- RESTful API (in progress)
- Gadget spec changes (mostly implemented already, some minor things
remaining like inline message bundles)
- JS changes (mostly opensocial-0.8, which will be a "new" feature, and a
few tweaks to gadgets.* libraries)

Cassie -- do you have an itemized list of all the 0.8 changes aggregated?
Should we just go from the spreadsheet?

For the time being, a separate JIRA issue for each major planned change is
probably a good idea to prevent us from stepping on each others' toes. Minor
changes (say, anything that  can be implemented with less than a 20 line
delta or so) should just be committed.


>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
>

Reply via email to