Hey Guys,
We had a bit of time pass since these emails, hows the weather on the
RESTful spec compliance side now? I kind of started laying the
groundwork today now that i caught up with the email & patches backlog
after the google I/O and my fingers are itching to get started on
this :)
-- Chris
On May 19, 2008, at 10:16 PM, Cassie wrote:
So the format right now... isn't right... so I wouldn't try to start
coding it on the php side. I am going to try to write some detailed
java tests in the next couple of days that will match the restful spec
exactly (for gets, not posts nor deletes yet). As soon as all of those
tests pass then the js will be good to go spec wise.
I don't anticipate it taking too long to clean up the json format, but
we are definitely not compliant yet so its good that you asked :)
I'll ping when the js is good to go.
- Cassie
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Well that goes without saying (or so i would have hoped), but you
have to
admit in general it is easier to develop when you know what your
code is
linked against (javascript libs in this case), is supposed to be
working and
fully correct to spec :)
I have no idea how far the assumptions in the js code are from the
spec,
maybe not at all or not in a way that it would influence a
implementation,
thats why i was asking :)
-- Chris
On May 19, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Kevin Brown wrote:
I think a better goal would be "all versions exactly match the
spec".
