+1 to have JUST ONE shindig list. On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shindig it's self is intended to be 'language neutral', sure we only have 2 > languages right now, but i think as far as the web goes we do happen to > cover at least the 2 languages with the highest reach.. So partially we are > already meeting that goal, and who knows that might expand somewhere in the > future. > > As such, most of the talk here is about things that concern both versions.. > the javascript samples, the features and the container configuration are all > shared, so is the conceptual architecture; And that's not completely > surprising since both versions implement the same open social specification. > > Hence i think you'll find most of the questions on this list are about > 'shindig', and are relatively language neutral.. And the questions that are > about specific implementations, i think you'd be surprised how many php > questions are answered by the 'java guys', and how many java questions by > the 'php guys' and the question how to solve a problem, and most of concepts > and apply to both versions of shindig. > > Separating this out would mean you get less support, less knowledge shared, > less peer review and having to discuss and solve a lot of problems twice.. > so from my personal point of view i'd have to say 'please no!' :-) > > -- Chris > > > On Jun 5, 2008, at 8:55 AM, Ram Sharma wrote: > > Hi, >> >> Do we have separate mailing list for Shindig PHP implementation. Why I am >> asking this question is because I think it could be a better way to >> concentrate on 1 product and separating out the problems significantly. >> >> -- >> Ram Sharma >> Software Engineer >> Impetus Infotech (India) Pvt Ltd >> Indore >> > > -- .-. --- .--. ..- R o p u
