On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My guess is that both 264 patches are desired. the second one applies > after I renamed and tweaked it a little bit, the first one prompted > this email as I had not clear how to fix it. > > I have not looked into the remaining ones, under the hypothesis that > there was a certain dependency beteween patches.
I've updated SHINDIG-264 so it applies against svn head as of a few minutes ago. SHINDIG-264 is safe to apply on it's own, it does not depend on the other patches I've send it. Cheers, Brian
