I think that Proxy is for Ajax requests I think...


On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Neo Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Please visit https://sites.google.com/site/neoanderson123/
>
> and there will be two images that will show you what the problem is...
>
> When I made some modifications in the gadget i.e., I have entered some data
> into the input fields on the gadget, and when I start dragging the gadget, a
> new proxy element(Copy of the gadget) will be created and in this  proxy,
> iFrame will start loading the page and it will display the form in reset
> mode(no data is entered.), meanwhile the original one will be in hidden
> state and when the dragging is completed the original gadget will be
> displayed.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> http://www.chabotc.com/images/iGoogle_proxy.png
>>
>> Sign up to the sand box, add a gadget that uses an iframe, and inspect the
>> results in firebug ... you'll notice that it does in fact use a proxy.
>> Anyhow, whats using a proxy have to do with drag and drop anyhow? I don't
>> see the correlation between the two.
>>
>> If your talking about the thread you linked earlier:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/90e77100785481da
>>
>> This isn't about a HTTP proxy, but about the 'code that draws the
>> transparent box that you see being dragged around', proxy is a rather
>> generic word that is used a lot:
>> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/proxy but in the case of that
>> email he didn't mean a 'HHTP Proxy' (which acts as an agent between the
>> gadget and a remote server by performing http requests for it) but a "agent
>> that draws things on the browsers canvas". I think this confusion may have
>> lead you on the wrong path on how to solve this
>>
>>        -- Chris
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 11, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Neo Anderson wrote:
>>
>>  @Chris
>>>
>>> I think iGoogle is not using any proxy there...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Neo Anderson <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hmm... That is what I am doing now. And the problems that I listed above
>>>> are because of this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Ropu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  just put the <iframe> inside a <div> and use that div to drag.
>>>>>
>>>>> or use the header (where the gadget title is displayed as the zone to
>>>>> drag.
>>>>> that part of the HTML is in the container page, no in the iframe
>>>>>
>>>>> hope this helps
>>>>>
>>>>> ropu
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Neo Anderson <
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Thank you,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know how it become possible in iGoogle. I am using jQuery UI.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You
>>>>>
>>>>>> can find a demo of the static widgets at:
>>>>>> http://tech-test.tutorialsforu.com/jQueryDnD.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Taking a look at iGoogle.com i would say that it -is- possible to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> support
>>>>>
>>>>>> drag and drop while having gadgets in iframe's
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know that doesn't solve your problem, but i would strongly suggest
>>>>>>> properly fixing your UI / drag&drop code, and not surrender all
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> security
>>>>>
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> your users just to avoid a UI coding problem :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> g'luck!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      -- Chris
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 10, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Neo Anderson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am asking you this because I am facing lot of problems while
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> implementing
>>>>>>>> Drag and Drop for my gadgets container.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/90e77100785481da
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Technically speaking you could of course with a slight bit of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hacking,
>>>>>
>>>>>>  but
>>>>>>>>> you really, really don't want to do this
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The cross domain policy is the very basis for gadget security (aka
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>
>>>>>>  being able to behave like a virus and edit your profile info, spam
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>
>>>>>>  your
>>>>>>>>> friends with LOLcat pictures and eat all your cookies).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Caja might solve this at some point in the future, but thats really
>>>>>>>>> 'future' and 'might' :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    -- Chris
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jun 10, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Neo Anderson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is there any way of creating gadgets without iFrames?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> .-. --- .--. ..-
>>>>> R o p u
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to