On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you forget the apache meme? If it's not in my mailbox, it doesn't exist > ! :-) Yeah, there's not really anything to send around though -- we talked about it, but nobody really had a good idea about what to do. I assume that Cassie was taking care of it since she's been working in that area. Might be nice to keep us who are not privy to the google meetings involved > in it? (both spec and shindig wise), else we'll end up having people > spinning their wheels for nothing, and no one likes to loose time, even just > some heads up would be useful for the people involved. (we went by cassie's > words "as soon as the php guys implement batching you can flip the switch", > so i had no insight in nor hints to these discussions) Well, there weren't actually any proposals for what to do, so there wasn't anything to share. If someone has a good idea of how to do it and wants to write it, by all means go for it. If you can make it work for PHP I'm sure it can be adapted for Java (there's certainly no reason why the PHP code has to follow the lead of what's done in the Java base, after all). > What's the problem, impossible to make such a request from javascript > (something i could imagine)? In that case i guess at least we can keep the > work we did so far on the php side. I don't know; David and Cassie had different opinions on the matter, so they talked to try to sort it out. I don't think they came to any conclusion on the matter, so hopefully someone with better ideas will :). > > -- Chris > > > On Jun 25, 2008, at 2:47 AM, Kevin Brown wrote: > > Several of us have been discussing this problem over at Google, but I >> don't >> know that there was a clear conclusion >> > >
