John Panzer (http://abstractioneer.org)
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Dirk Balfanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> - a request that carries the gadget security token should be able to > >> do anything the gadget could do > > > > > > Yes, since this is replacing the existing gadget to server wire protocol > and > > we don't want to break anything. > > Actually, that question (and answer) doesn't make sense to me. Gadget > don't "do" anything to the RESTful server. Users do. ...via the Gadget/OpenSocial JS APIs. So what's possible via the current JS API should at least be a subset of what's possible via the RESTful wire protocol. > > > Dirk. >
