Hey Cassie,
Thanks,
I get worried if I cause other developers unnecessary pain.... just
wanted to know for future, so if my git patches do cause a problem
let me know and I will be happy to write a script. (and share it)
Ian
On 28 Jul 2008, at 17:59, Cassie wrote:
You know, I may have just screwed it up :) I've never had to deal
with a git
patch before and didn't think to try patch -p1... If patch -p1
works then
that is all fine by me. Nicolaas already updated the jiras so I'll
use the
new patches now. Next time though we can just try a git patch again.
Sorry for causing confusion!
- Cassie
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:55 AM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I find it a little odd that we cant accept patches from Git, are
people
using some sort of automated patch applier that cant cope with an
extra path
element ?
If I am alone on this, I will write a script to munge git patches
into a
more acceptable form.
David,
Thank you got the suggestion, the reason I moved to Git was it was
becoming
impossible to manage more than one branch and SVN blocks after
more than a
few moves, making single commit re-factoring almost impossible. I
think in
my case, ->apache->git-svn->patch->local-svn->apache is going to
be rather
error prone, but whatever works for others makes sense.
Ian
On 28 Jul 2008, at 00:37, Nicolaas Matthijs (JIRA) wrote:
Ian, I think it's faster and more foolproof to just generate the
patches with svn's diff command. That means doing whatever you
can do
to get your changes from your git repo to a local svn wc will allow
you to do the diff. I had the same issue with mercurial and
relied on
hgsvn to do this.
davep
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Question as a git user, also generating patches that others
might want to
check.
Is there a way of generating svn patches using git, or do we
have to hand
edit the git patches to match
patch -p0 < patchfile
git-svn doesnt have a diff option, probably because git is patch
based
system.
( I am happy to try patch -p1 if patch -p0 doesn't work, but I
want to
what
generates least work for everyone, but I don't really want to
have to go
searching the tree much for the diff root more than that)
Ian
On 25 Jul 2008, at 16:40, Cassie wrote:
Yup - the patch you generated has git stuff in it, so I'm
guessing thats
why
it works for you.
I put the details of how to generate non git patches on your
first jira
issue but you can also find the info here:
http://incubator.apache.org/shindig/#creatingPatches
Thanks!
- Cassie
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Nicolaas Matthijs <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Cassie,
I just tried to apply my patch on a clean svn checkout, and it
works if
you
use
patch -p1 < "mypatch". This probably happens because I'm using
git.
Should I be adjusting my patches?
Thanks,
Nicolaas
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Cassie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nicolass - improving the sample container to be more "real" is
definitely
on
our list of things to do. Like Ropu mentioned we also want to
add
social
based features, but I think adding things like drag and drop
and real
prefs
etc is also a great place to start.
I definitely don't think the code should go all into the same
file :)
but
using the samplecontainer directory for all of the code makes
sense.
As for your patches, I was going to get those in today but
they are in
a
slightly incorrect format. ie patch -p0 < "your patch file"
doesn't
work.
I
updated the first jira issue with some quick instructions.
Once you
follow
those then hopefully I'll be able to patch away!
Thanks for your help.
- Cassie
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Ropu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hte issue with that is that iGoogle is a Gadget render, and
is not
using
the
social layer of opensocial
so for that you will need to add friends, activities,
persistence
layer.
so it should be more like a orkuy or hi5 that iGoogle.
still we have the partuza, a simple social network that has
all the
social
stuff ready to work with shindig
the only thing is that is coded in PHP :D
hope this helps
ropu
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Nicolaas Matthijs <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I would like to introduce an iGoogle like portal into
Shindig, which
allows
you to add multiple widgets in different columns and which
allows
to drag them around with the state being saved in a cookie.
I would
like
to
do this for 2 reasons:
1) I've seen several requests for this type of
functionality passing
on
the
list
2) I think it might increase uptake of Shindig if people
can see
what
can
be achieved with it
So my first question is whether you think this is a good
idea. My
second
question is where you
think this should go. Should it go as a (big) modification
to the
samplecontainer, which is perfectly
possible, or should it go in as a separate file in examples?
P.S.: I've done 3 patches for the samplecontainer already.
How long
does
it
normally take
to get an evaluation of those?
Thanks in advance,
Nicolaas
--
.-. --- .--. ..-
R o p u