On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Brown wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:24 AM, Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> Kevin Brown wrote: >> >> A far more appropriate solution is probably to enhance the >> content rewriter that Louis has written to support >> cajoling as >> one of the rewriting options. >> Where does that code live? >> .../gadgets/rewrite/... >> How would that option be specified? >> >> >> I think gadgets should be flagged as cajolable externally. >> Anything else would require spec changes or being non-standard. >> >> >> What do you mean by "flagged as cajolable externally"? >> >> In practice, it seems to me there are three scenarios: >> >> 1. Container allows gadgets to choose freely whether they are >> cajoled or not (more likely a sandbox than a live server). >> >> 2. Container forces Caja on all gadgets. >> >> 3. Container forces Caja on all gadgets except a whitelist (and >> those might choose to be Cajoled after all). >> >> >> #3 is exactly what I expect.#1 isn't possible without spec changes. >> > > Why not? They can <Require Feature="caja"> surely? They can <Optional feature="caja"/>, but there's no guarantee of that working across containers unless it's standardized. > > > #2 might be viable, assuming that it's possible for all / almost all >> gadgets to run cajoled. >> > > We have to get there from here, and to do that, we need to support 1. > > > >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ben. >> >> -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html >> http://www.links.org/ >> >> "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he >> doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff >> >> >> > > -- > http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.links.org/ > > "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he > doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff >
