On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't the proper thing be to first make sure it's part of the spec, and > then commit it to shindig? Not necessarily. As we learned with REST, validating the spec within the reference implementation is a very useful exercise to go through before voting in a standard. I'd rather have shindig eat the pain of upgrading than live with a crappy spec. > > > You can have my +1 though, could've been my +2 if you coded it in PHP as > well :) > > -- Chris > > > On Aug 4, 2008, at 11:26 PM, Brian Eaton wrote: > > Hey folks - >> >> I'd like to implement OAuth authenticated preloads in Shindig. A spec >> enhancement has been proposed, but no votes as yet: >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-and-gadgets-spec/browse_thread/thread/063f21fff236d738 >> >> I don't think this is a particularly controversial enhancement, nor >> will gadgets that use the enhanced Preload tag break on non-shindig >> containers. Any objections to it landing in Shindig? >> >> Cheers, >> Brian >> > >
