Maven? Do you honestly think that the potentially tens of thousands of
shared hosts that deploy one of the products that do / will include
php shindig all have maven, or even a command line? :)
The potential market currently for php shindig is quite large in the
mid to small sized site range (through joomla, social engine, ringside
networks' product, etc or their own work), but a lot of them depend on
20$ a month shared hosting or something and don't have a lot of
flexibility in what to install or build.
We could, if we absolutely have too, introduce such a dependency; But
that would have a very large impact on the potential shindig using
landscape
-- Chris
On Aug 15, 2008, at 9:00 PM, Jasvir Nagra wrote:
Um perhaps I was misunderstood. I'm not suggesting that the right way
to go is to port caja to php... I think making an rpc call/command
line call is perfectly valid. However while caja is implemented in
java, there'll be a need to manage jars and extract javascript files
from php unless maven can be setup to export non-jars.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Gonzalo Aune
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, its not like PHP will NEVER support caja, it takes some time,
but PHP
perfectly can have it, but as i say before, it will be a HUGE
effort to do a
port to PHP
G.-
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Ugh.
We need a way for PHP to depend on Caja, or we need to get
gadgets.util.sanitizeHtml pulled out of the opensocial spec, or we
need to accept that PHP Shindig will never implement that function.
For now we can probably make the implementation of
gadgets.util.sanitizeHtml dependent on the presence of the Caja HTML
sanitization code.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I build in a 'ignore anything that starts with res://' into the
feature
parsing a while ago already (back then it was the caja changes
that made
php
shindig upset), so the changes doesn't cause the world to burn
directly.
However the file won't be included by php shindig either, so
please that
keep in mind before building something that depends on it,
otherwise you
could break quite a few social sites :)
On Aug 15, 2008, at 8:22 PM, Josh Landin wrote:
I agree.
On 8/15/08, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Requiring PHP users to build, download, and manage a jar (not to
mention
adding the code to deal with it to the PHP build) to get one
javascript
file
is completely unreasonable.
