Dear GB Thanks for the reply.
I have an understanding of the same and have no doubts over distance 0,1,2 But what i asked was more from shindig prespective and he case i had explained. The documentation on network distance in gole docs does not specify abput the case i had asked. Can you please re look at the case i had mentioned !!!!!! On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Guido Barosio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI > > > http://code.google.com/apis/opensocial/docs/0.8/reference/#opensocial.IdSpec.Field.NETWORK_DISTANCE > > Hope it clears out your doubts. > > GB.- > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:10 AM, peeyush gulati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Any update !!!!! > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: peeyush gulati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:09 PM > > Subject: Network Distance > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: peeyush gulati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Hi All > > > > I was concerened about Network Distance feature of open social > specification > > 0.8 > > > > What i understand of network distance is the distance between 2 people in > a > > social networking. > > > > Lets say a case is there > > > > (A)--->(B) " ---> INDICATES FRIEND ' > > (A)--->(C) > > > > (C)--->(D) > > (C)--->(E) > > > > > > (D)--->(E) > > > > the same has been shown in the diagram attached here. > > > > Now according to my understanding Network Distance between A & E = 2 > and > > also 3 when we take person D into the path. > > > > So do we give a priority to the lesser one. Or would this person D come > up > > in both the cases when finding people with network distance 2 or 3. > > > > > > I believe Network distance is still not supported and updated into > shindig. > > Are we going to do the same in shindig release 1.0 or can we do it > before. > > Also please specify what algorithm we would follow in cases like above. > > Implementing a algorith is not a big deal but i am skeptical about > gadgets > > whiich would fetch people with network distance 4,5 and above, keeping > the > > complexity of computation in place. > > > > > > Please do correct if my understanding is wrong at any place. > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > Peeyush > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks and Regards > > Peeyush Gulati > > +91-9916304135 > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks and Regards > > Peeyush Gulati > > +91-9916304135 > > > > > > -- > Guido Barosio > ----------------------- > http://www.globant.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Thanks and Regards Peeyush Gulati +91-9916304135
